On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:38:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > If the package does not build properly on a normal system, under the > > circumstances you describe, that means there is a bug.
> > It does not mean that the correct fix for the bug is to change the > > build-depends or the build-conflicts. > It is fixable by changing the build-depends or build-conflicts. That doesn't mean that's the *right* fix. Packages fail to build all the time because of broken build-dependencies with fucked up handling of .la files. That doesn't mean the answer is to change the build-dependencies of the failing package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/