Quoting Thomas Huriaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't see any reason to close this bug. If you don't want to fix this > issue, please tag it as wontfix. > > In order to have this bug fixed, I wrote a full patch. Here are my > comments on the debconf templates, as the rest just depends on these > fixes:
The reason to close this bug is that is has been fixed. The problem was that I included information using debconf that didn't need to be there. All of the qmail-src debconf entries did not fit the policy, and have been removed. I am the package maintainer, and I am allowed to make decisions on what information is included and displayed when the package is installed. I have decided that my previous use of debconf has been deprecated, and therefore, I have no further use for debconf. In fact, I have removed all dependency on debconf from qmail-src. I won't close this bug, but I'll move it to the wishlist. The package does not violate the "spirit" of what debconf was intended for, or any Debian policies, or even interact in any way with debconf. Technically, what you are now asking, is that I add in new debconf support. Thank you for the suggestion, I will add it to the wishlist. If that is not enough to placate you, please feel free to waste more of everyone's time and whine on. Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
