Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
Related to BTS #272409.
Pb detected on a fresh etch installation (aptitude-0.4.4-1) but reported
from a sarge box. The package dependencies attached by reportbug is
uncorrect.
# cd /root ; rm -fr .aptitude; LANG=C aptitude clean; ls -lisa .aptitude
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Building tag database... Done
total 8
32577 4 drwx------ 2 root root 4096 2007-01-17 12:31 .
32579 4 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2007-01-17 12:31 ..
32589 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-01-17 12:31 config
Is there any usfullness in creating an empty config file when
aptitude is used ?
Reading through aptitude changelog attached to #272409, I'm even wondering if
creating .aptitude is usfull at all ?
@+,
Fab
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.4-caladan
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6 0.5.28.6 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13sarge1 GCC support library
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-4 type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
