On 25.03.05 Guus Sliepen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi,
> I get this error when upgrading tetex-extra: > >From which version, to which one? > This is Omega, Version 3.14159--1.23.2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INIOMEGA) > Copyright (c) 1994--2000 John Plaice and Yannis Haralambous > [...] > ================================= > Applying patch file ltpatch.ltx > ================================= > (/usr/share/texmf/omega/lambda/omegabook/ltpatch.ltx) > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > !! Patch file `ltpatch.ltx' (for version <2001/06/01>) > !! is not suitable for version <2003/12/01> of LaTeX. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > !! Please check if initex found an old patch file: > !! --- if so, rename it or delete it, and redo the > !! initex run. > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > What does kpsewhich latex.ltx tell you? > So omega complains about ltpatch.ltx being outdated. Maybe this > also caused the similar problems mentioned in #269584? > AFAICT 269584 has nothing to do with your problem. > Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on: > ii dpkg 1.13.0 Package maintenance system for > Deb > ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11-0.1 Fonts for the Ghostscript > interpre > ii tetex-base 2.99.7.20041225-beta-1 Basic library files of teTeX > ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 The teTeX binary files > Hmm: 1. An upgrade of tetex-base should have upgraded the ltpatch.ltx too. Although I must say, that the patch above is at a weird location. It should sit in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/. 2. That version of tetex-base is quite old meanwhile. Newer versions should conflict with tetex-bin < 2.99, as these version don't play together. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
