On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:52:56AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:35:19PM +0000, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 20.01.2007, 00:07 +0100 schrieb Aurélien GÉRÔME: > > > The powerpc package is unusable, so this bug is RC. To lower the > > > severity to important, you can ask for the removal of the powerpc deb > > > from the archive and restrict the build of xaralx to some architectures > > > where the package is known to work on.
> > > Please do not take this is as an offense, this is not meant to be. :) > > I don’t have a powerpc box around to test this. I could do as you said > > and have only i386 included, but I actually feel like just having xaralx > > removed from testing anyways: It was not completely free’ed as promised > > and xaralx is not important enough to increase the non-free section of > > etch IMHO. > > Hopefully xaralx development will pick up again and the core will become > > free as well. Until then, we maybe should keep it out of testing > > alltogether, for example with this RC bug :-) > Sure. :) > > Do I need to take action or will xaralx be removed automatically from > > etch now that is has an RC bug? > The package is currently in testing, so you will have to mail > debian-release to ask for its removal, or the Release Managers will > see this bug and remove the package by themselves. :) The latter. I'll probably delay removing from testing for a day or two in case Joachim has a change of heart, but if not I'll kick it right out, no worries. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
