Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:52:09 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> ucfq without a full patch makes some sense, however: Maybe only if a >> switch specifies "interactive mode". > > Well. It would add complexity to the code; and it is easy > enough to type in the full path name with modern shell tab > completion -- I am not sure the increased complexity is worth the > increase in convenience.
It's easy to type the full path if you know it; but there are other use cases like "Hm, none of the files in /etc/foo.d/ are registered with dpkg, are any registered with ucf?" > This will have to be a case of features that might get added > if someone contributes tested patches :) I'll keep that in mind and don't expect any wonders to happen without me sending a patch... Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
