Quoting Davide G. M. Salvetti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi again,
> 
> I forgot to mention: please, do not fix bugs in NMU unless needed;
> localization issues are ok, but 388927 is better left to the maintainer
> (you can of course provide a patch, but let the maintainer decide
> whether to accept it or not).


Well, I beg to disagree here. I claim some experience about debconf
stuff and the removed debconf note is, I'm afraid, blatant debconf
abuse. So, as this indeed affects l10n, I consider fixing this part of
the l10n catching up work, especially when the initial bug report for
debconf abuse got no comment.

Sorry for the mess with the lack of received notice on your
side...there seem to be a really wrong way to handle <package>@p.d.o
mails on Debian servers.

Anyway, I leave all this in your hands....


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to