Op 28-01-2007 om 23:07 schreef Rick Thomas: > > > Does looking closely at what Phill supplied for his original report > help any?: > > >Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: > >phill:/home/phill# lspci -nn > >... <snip> ... > >00:12.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 > >[Rhine-II] [1106:3065] (rev 7c) > >... <snip> > > > >Output of lspci -vnn: > >phill:/home/phill# lspci -vnn > >...<snip>... > >00:12.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 > >[Rhine-II] [1106:3065] (rev 7c) > > Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device [1043:80ed] > > Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 217 > > I/O ports at d800 [size=256] > > Memory at febff800 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256] > > Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 > >...<snip> > > I'm not enough of a PCI hardware guru to know if this is going to be > recognized as a NIC. Anybody else?
It is a NIC. Later in the install process it becomes eth1. > Also, I saw a bunch of PCI bridges and so on. Is is possible that > the NIC is on the far side of one of them and that's confusing the > issue? Or am I talking total nonsense? > > Just a thought... That is also how I see it. HtH GSt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]