Package: dirvish
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

Hi,

This is using rsync 2.6.4-6 (yes, etch is still testing so we're not using 
it on that server :-)

If rsync has a "file vanished on sender" error, it apparently reports an 
error code to dirvish which interprets this as "backup of this tree has 
failed."  But for the purpose of taking a backup, the tree has not failed - 
some files disappeared, but since I still have a backup of the whole tree, 
backup succeeded hence dirvish should report a success.

Why does this matter?
 * monitoring
 * we use hook scripts to write dirvish trees to tape for off-site backup.  
I used to evaluate the dirvish success code and only write the tree to tape 
if success was reported.

cheers
-- vbi


-- 
It was a trojan now it was identified that it was that machine the trojan
was not identified but it was identified as being that machine.
        -- Jamie the spammer, 10/29/2003

Attachment: pgpSJnB9nT3oE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to