> Please don't misinterpret my previous comments as criticism of you as  
> maintainer -- whoever wrote the code evidently just completely failed  
> to consider setups different to their own.


That is interesting because, being currently subscribed to the
package's PTS even though I'm not the maintainer, I actually didn't
went through your entire bug report mostly because of the way it was
explained at the beginning.

I mostly read something like "this package is providing brain-dead
code"....which then prevented me to hear the very valid arguments you
developed further...which I actually read when I read your *second*
mail.

Something interesting to consider, maybe, when interacting with
package maintainers and developers..:-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to