On Mon, February 12, 2007 12:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Stefano Melchior wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:50:35AM +0000, Brian Brunswick wrote: >> Dear Brian, >> > Package: user-mode-linux >> > Version: 2.6.18-1um-2 >> > Severity: normal >> > >> > >> > I wanted to mount a luks partition from inside uml, >> > but found that the sha256 kernel module wasn't built in the debian >> package. >> > >> > Rebuilding the package with this enabled went fine, so please consider >> > it for the standard config. >> I was wondering if this submitted bug should be tagged as "wishlist", >> instead of "normal": I do not think this is a bug. >> I would like to ask to Mattia if it is the case to make a new version >> upload for Etch or to leave for Etch+1 >> Cheers >> > > It seems more like an accidental omission rather than deliberate. Most > other crypto modules /are/ built.
Yep, definitely an accident... I'm wondering why in the world it is not enabled already. Anyway I don't think it makes a big difference between "normal" or "wishlist" in this case... -- mattia :wq!