Package: pngcrush
Version: 1.6.4-3
Severity: minor
As mentioned before, due to an erroneous man page SYNOPSIS, I ran
'pngcrush *' in a directory with only two files:
% ls -log
total 32554
-rw-r----- 1 16638693 Jun 14 2005 Jettaradio0001.png
-rw-r----- 1 16562597 Jun 14 2005 Jettaradio0002.png
% pngcrush *
[...]
Recompressing Jettaradio0001.png
[...]
Best pngcrush method = 9 (fm 5 zl 2 zs 2) for Jettaradio0002.png
[...]
'pngcrush' examined the first file, and overwrote the second with an
optimized compression of the first. Result: two files with different
names and the same image data, while the original second file's image
data was deleted.
Yet it's not obvious from the standard output quoted above what
had been done. The part that says "for Jettaradio0002.png" seems
confusing. Suggested wording:
Best pngcrush method = 9 (fm 5 zl 2 zs 2) output to Jettaradio0002.png
Hope this helps...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages pngcrush depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libpng12-0 1.2.15~beta5-1 PNG library - runtime
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
pngcrush recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
