tags 403859 + help patch pending thanks Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > devscripts (bts.1) reads: > | The owner of a bug accepts the responsibility of dealing with it, and > | will receive all of the email corresponding to the bug instead of the > | usual maintainer. > > However, Don said 8 months ago in #327608 that this isn't true: > |Owner is just a means of indicating who is working on a bug.
Hi Don, can you please confirm what you wrote at the end of #327608, namely that the "owner" command does not make you automatically subscribed to the bug report and additionally that it does not have any functional effect beside declaring who is working on the bug? I'm closing this bug report (against the bts devscript) with the attached patch which changes its documentation. I would be glad if you can proof-read it. If the patch sounds fine to you it would be worth to change the documentation of the BTS web interface accordingly. Many thanks in advance, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Index: scripts/bts.pl =================================================================== --- scripts/bts.pl (revision 542) +++ scripts/bts.pl (working copy) @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ Change the "owner" address of a bug, with `!' meaning `use the address on the current email as the new owner address'. -The owner of a bug accepts the responsibility of dealing with it, and -will receive all of the email corresponding to the bug instead of the -usual maintainer. +The owner of a bug accepts the responsibility of dealing with it. Note that the +"owner" of a bug does not receive automatically all of the email corresponding +to the bug; use "subscribe" to achieve that. =cut
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
