Package: network-manager
Version: 0.6.4-6
Followup-For: Bug #403112

OldWorld PowerMac beige G3 tower.  Bog-standard configuration.  No additional 
devices above those on the motherboard.  
In particular, the only ethernet interface is the "bmac" that comes standard on 
lots of OldWorld PowerMac machines.

First I installed (20070228-2 "Netinst") using the default configuration 
("Desktop" and "standard" tasks checked in 
tasksel).  The install went fine.  No difficulties with network access.  
Network info came from dhcp.

After the reboot, however, network access was not available.  Poking around in 
the log files brought up this snippit:

===================
Mar  1 02:48:11 debian NetworkManager: <information>^Istarting... 
Mar  1 02:48:11 debian NetworkManager: <information>^Ieth0: Driver 'bmac' does 
not support carrier detection. ^IYou 
must switch to it manually. 
Mar  1 02:48:11 debian NetworkManager: <information>^Inm_device_init(): waiting 
for device's worker thread to start 
Mar  1 02:48:11 debian NetworkManager: <information>^Inm_device_init(): 
device's worker thread started, continuing. 
Mar  1 02:48:11 debian NetworkManager: <information>^INow managing wired 
Ethernet (802.3) device 'eth0'. 
Mar  1 02:48:11 debian NetworkManager: <information>^IDeactivating device eth0. 
===================

So I did "aptitude remove network-manager-gnome" and rebooted.  After the 
reboot, the network (via the bmac) was 
available again.

Many OldWorld PowerMac machines have bmac interfaces as their only way of 
geting to the network.  If network-manager 
was smart enough to see that the machine has only one network interface, and 
not deactivate it out-of-hand (regardless 
of how braindead the interface may seem to be), then this problem would be much 
less severe.

As it is, however, this is a very serious problem.  I don't think it's a good 
idea to release Etch without solving this 
one way or another.  It renders a whole class of machines unusable.

For machines with two or more network interfaces (a bmac and one or more 
others) the workaround of not deactivating the 
only interface would not work.  But presumably, people with such machines would 
be sophisticated enough to deal with 
the problem some other way.

Rick


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-powerpc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages network-manager depends on:
ii  adduser                     3.102        Add and remove users and groups
ii  dbus                        1.0.2-1      simple interprocess messaging syst
pn  dhcdbd                      <none>       (no description available)
ii  hal                         0.5.8.1-6.1  Hardware Abstraction Layer
ii  ifupdown                    0.6.8        high level tools to configure netw
pn  iproute                     <none>       (no description available)
pn  iputils-arping              <none>       (no description available)
ii  libc6                       2.3.6.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdbus-1-3                 1.0.2-1      simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2            0.71-3       simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libgcrypt11                 1.2.3-2      LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglib2.0-0                2.12.4-2     The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgpg-error0               1.4-1        library for common error values an
ii  libhal1                     0.5.8.1-6.1  Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
pn  libiw28                     <none>       (no description available)
pn  libnl1-pre6                 <none>       (no description available)
pn  libnm-util0                 <none>       (no description available)
ii  lsb-base                    3.1-23       Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
pn  wpasupplicant               <none>       (no description available)

network-manager recommends no packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to