On Sun, 04 Mar 2007, Anthony Towns wrote: > The other side is just making the Debian mirror network available for > kfreebsd users. With only a couple of dozen apparent users, I'm not > really convinced that's particularly valuable though. YMMV.
Why did we do SCC for then ? I'm certainly uneasy with your answers. To me, having a Debian GNU/FreeBSD looks like a very valuable goal and we should support it, each at our own level. One shouldn't need more "justification" than this. Then we can discuss constraints and related problems if there are some. It seems pretty clear that they have done much progress already, and we should be glad that they want to go to the next step. Most of your other answers relate to possible problems that do not concern the ftpmasters in the first place. I'd like to know what problems the inclusion of kfreebsd-i386 would create for ftpmasters. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
