* Thomas Themel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070310 16:56]: > Hi, > > as Dani??l states, it would be nice if websec behaved like a proper web > robot. Baruch, are you aware that the change is basically a two-liner?
I'm not even sure that it should go for robots.txt, the idea of websec is that it behaves more like a browser, it doesn't crawl the website, it doesn't try to go anywhere it's not directly instructed to and if a user insists on misbehaving the server has nothing to do for it, or do you expect a browser to prevent a user from reloading a page every second? > The only design issue is that a robot UA requires a 'from' email address > and I'm not quite sure how to supply that. I'd use the destination > address(es) for the reports, but that's probably not a good idea with > respect to privacy. What do you think? That won't be acceptable at all. If I will do that it will be with a fake email address and a configuration item to change it. An upgrade to the new version should never expose the users email to other parties. Baruch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
