On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:22:50 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:53:54AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: >> I am a bit disappointed by the downgrading of the severity of bug >> #413766. I have filled it under critical with justfication "breaks >> unrelated software". It was downgraded to important without any >> justification and the discussion in debian-release did not even >> mention this bug. > > This "breaks unrelated software" only if you have configured that software > to look at the contents of this package. Do you intend to also claim > ca-certificates "breaks unrelated software" every time it drops a CA > certificate because they determine the certificate authority isn't > trustworthy?
This is not the case here ! There is only a renaming. The fix is easy and this bug should stay critical to not slip out of Etch. If a function was renamed in libc, would you say that it breaks unrelated software only if you have configured that software to use this function ? The aim of ca-certificates is to be used by packages requiring certificates. Its "interface" should be stable. Please, set back severity to critical to ensure that this bug will be fixed for Etch and will not be forgot.
