On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:12 +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > Package: exim4 > Version: 4.24-3
You do realise that the version quoted above is nearly three and a half years old? It's even eight upstream releases older than the version in sarge. > this bug is in response to several bug reports which i have raised > regarding exim4, which are all to do with improving exim4. each and > every such bug has been treated with derision. As far as I can see, you've submitted two bug reports against the Debian exim4 packages in the past four years, both asking for a change to the default configuration which the maintainers disagreed with. That is their prerogative and there are established procedures which exist if you believe you have a good case to get a technical decision overturned. Your public interaction with upstream appears to consist of a single thread on exim-users in February, in which you claimed exim was broken because it allowed an empty envelope sender to be used - a feature of SMTP for which support has been required since at least 1982 and without which no-one would ever be able to receive bounces. In my opinion, this bug should be closed, but I'll leave that decision to the maintainers. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
