Quoting Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > it's ok - the point has been made. > > there is no "hijacking". > > and the bug is in the attitude of the exim4 developers and the exim4 > maintainers, not in the software.
I'm subscribed to exim4's PTS for about 3 years now and I have never seen any evidence of arrogant and non listening attitude from the exim4 package mainainers. I personnally consider the exim4 package well maintained with maintainers listening to bug reports, opened to discussion and using their maintainer's prerogatives only when needed. The only thing that's missing them is more manpower to even better deal with bugs, probably clean out the BTS and be able to conduct more disruptive changes if they're needed. This is indeed a very common problem for most core packages in Debian but there are many packages which need more manpower much more than exim4. I find this bug report pretty offensive to exim4 maintainers who are doing are tremendous job.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
