[Re-sending: my message yesterday does not seem to have made it to b.d.u]
Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, without checking I cannot tell it for true at 100%, but I believe > this bug is already corrected in current unstable/testing version (1.0.3). > Current woody backport [1] is at 1.0.0beta3, and probably fixes this too. Sorry no, it is not fixed anywhere. > The only thing we can do is patch the current package as Justin proposed > (it was a trivial patch, isn't it?) and upload it to woody proposed-updates. I propose the following patch. This "goes cleanly" into versions 1.0.3 1.0.4 1.9.2 1.9.6 and elicits only mild (fuzz/offset) messages for 0.7.4 . Cheers, Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia --- src/mbox.c.orig Mon Feb 7 18:48:12 2005 +++ src/mbox.c Thu Mar 31 08:29:29 2005 @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ FILE *tmp_fp; GSList *cur; gchar *startp, *endp, *rpath; + gint empty_prev_line; gint empty_line; gboolean is_next_msg = FALSE; FilterInfo *fltinfo; @@ -131,17 +132,19 @@ FPUTS_TO_TMP_ABORT_IF_FAIL(buf); from_line[0] = '\0'; + empty_prev_line = 0; empty_line = 0; while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), mbox_fp) != NULL) { if (buf[0] == '\n' || buf[0] == '\r') { + empty_prev_line = 1; empty_line++; buf[0] = '\0'; continue; } /* From separator */ - while (!strncmp(buf, "From ", 5)) { + while (empty_prev_line && !strncmp(buf, "From ", 5)) { strcpy(from_line, buf); if (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), mbox_fp) == NULL) { buf[0] = '\0'; @@ -163,6 +166,7 @@ break; } } + empty_prev_line = 0; if (is_next_msg) break; if (empty_line > 0) { -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
