On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:34:04 +0100, Ricardo wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> tags 415804 moreinfo > thanks > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:21:57 +0100 > Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: sylpheed-gtk1 > > Version: 1.0.6-4 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > ....I'm a MH folder guy, not Maildir guy > > That's an interesting change, though the bugreport is still as useless as > previous one to solve your problem (copy-pasting didn't add any info :-P). ..aye, and as useless as your --debug option and your documentation, none of these hints towards what I needed, a check for a chk 'n rm of my stale /tmp/sylpheed-$UID lockfile. ..once you guys fix at least the docs to include my wee hint above, and preferably add a check for stale lock files, feel free to close or refocus this bug, I have both Sylpheed and Sylpheed-gtk1 working now. > Anyway 175k mails in a folder requires a pretty good machine to perform > reasonably. On which processor and how much RAM are you running this? ..an 8 yr old AMD k6-2 450MHz w 384MB of ram, takes at least half an hour to re-index or whatever it does to line up D-U for reading. > You also can try the newer sylpheed in experimental (2.4.0~beta5-1) and > see if it works better. It has been uploaded few minutes ago, so it can > take a few hours to be available on the mirrors. ..it checks for stale lockfiles? ..anyway, S-2.3 is _much_ better than S-2.0.0, it sucked so bad I stayed with S-gtk1, but S-2.3 is a-most as quick as S-gtk1 on this box and has better utf8 support, thanks, Rccardo and Hiro. :o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
