Am Montag 26 März 2007 04:38 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > Package: libopenobex > Version: 1.3-3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > currently, no libbluetooth2-dev is available on GNU/kFreeBSD (and > that is quite "normal", I'd say, given the description and the > source of bluez-libs), so your package can't be built on this > platform. Please find attached a patch to make bluetooth-related > stuff optional for kfreebsd-*, so that your package can be built and > installed on this platform, if you feel that your package is useful > anyway. I'd think so since there's a B-D on libusb-dev, and I guess > that many PDAs can be used through an USB link. I wasn't able to > build libsyncml (my APT cache is missing some B-Ds and I'm offline > at the moment), but gnome-vfs-obexftp can be built and installed > successfully. > > I'm keeping severity=wishlist since I'm not sure about the usability > of your package w/o bluetooth (but I'm quite sure it is more useful > like that than FTBFSing...).
Looking at http://cvsup.pt.freebsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libbluetooth/bluetooth.h?rev=1.2&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Can't you simply provide libbluetooth2-dev with kfreebsd? Would make MUCH more sense than adding special exceptions to all bluetooth packages. And maybe the *BSD guys could stop the non-sense that every f***ing *BSD names the necessary bluetooth socket struct and its elements differently? Linux was there first and they could have followed its naming without ANY problems. This sucks... HS
