Thanks for your fast response! On Thu, 2007-29-03 at 01:33 +0200, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > Hi Jack, > > > I'm trying to access a Samba share using auto.smb. > > that is, the package-shipped default /etc/auto.smb program map, right?
Right. > > In /smb/hostname, > > auto.smb correctly lists available share names. However in > > /smb/hostname/*(/*/*/... ad infinitum) it also lists available share > > names, never share contents: > > What kind of machine is acting as SMB/CIFS server? Ubuntu Edgy machine running Samba. > > ket% ls /smb/192.168.0.14 > > print share > > ket% ls /smb/192.168.0.14/share > > print share > > ket% ls /smb/192.168.0.14/share/Movies > > print share > > ket% > > So /proc/mounts should be still clear of smb/cifs entries... do you see > any failed mount attempts in syslog? - Could you insert a logging command > at the top of /etc/auto.smb to check what $key values the automounter is > really looking up? Wow, thanks for your clear troubleshooting advice. I should probably have thought of these myself : ( /proc/mounts is clear of smb/cifs entries, I do see a failed mount attempt in syslog: Mar 28 19:17:24 ket kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13 Mar 28 19:17:24 ket kernel: CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -13 Mar 28 19:17:24 ket automount[4859]: >> Password: mount error 13 = Permission denied Mar 28 19:17:24 ket automount[4859]: >> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs) Mar 28 19:17:24 ket automount[4859]: mount(generic): failed to mount //mog.local/share (type cifs) on /smb/mog.local/share Mar 28 19:17:24 ket kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13 However the following works successfully: ket% sudo mount //mog.local/share /share -o guest Anonymous login successful ket% So I assume /etc/auto.smb is simply missing a mount option incase $credfile doesn't exist? > > In addition to my Debian unstable machine, I've tried with another > > Debian machine and a couple Ubuntu Edgy machines: Same behavior. > > Have you tried replacing the server, too, or just the client? So far just the client. > Thanks for reporting! Thank you Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
