* Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 2005-04-01 11:53:02 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: > > That's a nice sentiment, but it's not true in this case. Browser > > plugins are dynamically loaded libraries that get executed in the > > browser's memory space. So they can very much crash the browser. > > OK. Any chance that the plugin protocol gets fixed for better > memory protection and security?
I doubt there's any real movement in that direction, but who knows? The best thing to do would to write a free, non-crappy flash plugin :) -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
