Could this or one of the related bugs be reassigned to iceweasel so
it's easier to find?  I only found it indirectly, via #408139, which
on its face is a bit different (though I think it's the same
underlying problem).

The behavior I would expect and hope for is that when one invokes
iceweasel it looks for running iceweasel's *by the same user on the
same system*.  Operating under su is a corner case; my vote would be
that "user" in that case refers to the user su'd to.

There is now the --no-remote option to start a new instance, but this
is fairly crude.  A lot of the discussion on these bugs centers on the
fact that starting a new instance is not safe (or maybe even
possible?) if there is already a running instance for the current user
and machine.

I'd appreciate cc's on followup, since the bug subscription system is
not working reliably.

Ross Boylan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to