2007-04-13 (금), 16:50 +0200, Christian Perrier 쓰시길: > Quoting trand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Package: fontconfig-config > > Version: 2.4.2-1.2 > > Severity: wishlist > > Tags: l10n > > > > For korean font, ttf-baekmuk is almost dead. > > development is stop, people don't use it. > > Please note that I am not the fontconfig maintainer. I just happen to > be subscribed to the package's PTS and saw your bug report. > > As you suggest this, it seems to me that D-I should probably stop > installing ttf-baekmuk when the installation language is Korean. > > The korean-desktop task currently installs: > > Packages-list: > imhangul > nabi > ttf-unfonts > imhangul-status-applet > iceweasel-l10n-ko > xfonts-baekmuk > ttf-baekmuk > openoffice.org-help-ko > openoffice.org-l10n-ko > kde-i18n-ko > > > So, ttf-unfonts are already installed and, if this is what you > suggest, we could remove ttf-baekmuk.
> What about xfonts-baekmuk? Should they be dropped from there also? It depends on what our default desktop looks like. While ttf-unfonts is a much better choice in antialiased environment (GNOME/KDE) or for printing, it's almost unusable in non-antialiased environment (ie. traditional X apps). That's why baekmuk is used in bf-utf-source, while ttf-unfonts is used for G-I. If we can just ignore such traditional apps in the default desktop installation, it's ok to drop ttf-baekmuk and xfonts-baekmuk. -- Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
