Hi Adam, On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:14 -0400, Adam Kessel wrote: > > I'm not sure exactly how/why SquirrelMail became more strict with > address books, but it is definitely a problem for users. I don't know > how the pseudo-corruption got in there in the first place, since only > SquirrelMail ever had write privileges to the address books in > question. > But it would be nice if there were some way for SquirrelMail to fix or > ignore the problem so it would still be usable after upgrade without > manual intervention on the backend.
I agree. I'll see if I can reproduce the problem and make sure SquirrelMail is less picky about it. Thank you for your report! Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
