Hi Alban, On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:01:34AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > thanks for taking care of this problem. I have not understood if > a fix was found but i can confirm a bug it produce. > > > I had this error (my proxy was unable to start): > /var/log/squid/cache.log > 2005/03/31 16:42:20| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 13 to > *:3128: (98) Address already in use FATAL: Cannot open HTTP Port > > > lsof -i and netstat wher unable to show anything bound to port > 3128 . Out of luck i killed zeroconf and the problem disappeared.
lsof and netstat should not have any problems with multiple addresses per interface. > SHould i bug report (wishlist) against lsof and netstat that they don't > manage multiple address per interface ? > Or is this an unrelated problem ? I knew that zeroconf bound to > interface but does it opens some ports on those (which may > explain why lo 3128 was not free) ? I would liek to build a test > case before reporting the problem further. It is hard to say at the moment; it certainly could be an interaction with zeroconf but I'm not sure. Please send the output of '/sbin/ip addr' and '/sbin/ip route' if possible. Thanks, Anand -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
