On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:46:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:21:41PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > > > For the time being I think that the cleanest thing to do is to add a > > zeroconf method to the inet and inet6 address families. Initially the > > Note that zeroconf should not be used with IPv6 - that includes its own > link local allocation mechanism that's not such a bolt-on and is handled > by the kernel.
Yes - totally agreed, it is a bug that zeroconf currently wil attempt to assign an IPv4 link-local address to an interface with an address family of 'inet6'. Regards, Anand -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
