On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 11:26 -0400, Ari Pollak wrote: > This definitely won't be feasible until after the final 2.0 release > since the API is open to change before then; but even after that > release, libpurple isn't really in a state yet where it can be easily > separated and create the same kind of clean library dependencies that > people expect on a Debian system.
Huh? What's the problem with libpurple? Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
