On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:22:47AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Yes, but I think the initial patch author's point was that 99% of the > now-Linux-specific Makefile really is just glibc specific, he just > thought it was better not to rename or otherwise factorise it for easy > success. > > It's clear that we want to have these patches upstream though, so thanks > for your insight about future directions.
BTW, is there a hurd development system for DD somewhere, where you could put "ready to test" nss source tree? If so, I could at least help a bit doing this better. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
