-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 severity 303612 important
On 07-04-2005 19:44, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > I just upgraded from uw-imapd-ssl in woody to uw-imapd from unstable. I > took the default answers to the new debconf questions, in particular, > listen on imap2 and imaps, and do not "enforce port selection". My > previous uw-imapd-ssl configuration listened on the same two ports in > inetd.conf; however, after upgrading, there were no imap entries in > inetd.conf. I'm guessing that the new package chose not to "enforce" > the port selections, because I was upgrading. However, since this is > the first time I saw the debconf questions, I expected my choices to be > honored this time. When I changed my answer to the enforce question to > yes, the lines were added to inetd.conf as expected. > > It seems that this could trip people upgrading from woody, so it would > be good to create a better transition. When upgrading from a > pre-debconf version, the selected ports should probably be enforced > unconditionally. I agree! Raising severity... - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCVXein7DbMsAkQLgRAssnAKCVSrbmWRchnNQWTrkkVePcFAL1AwCeNrto jgVIwizVUPgtIfoqVIya8Lo= =Linn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
