On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:43:02PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:14:33PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote: > > > > # /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display ghc > > ghc - status is manual. > > link currently points to /usr/lib/ghc-6.4/bin/ghc > > The alternatives system thinks you have manually set ghc to point to ghc > 6.4. This is probably due to a bug in an older version of ghc6. > > > Your suggestion 'update-alternatives --auto ghc' does work, however. > > OK, so it sounds like you are now sorted.
Yeah, I was just thinking that maybe there would be a more 'stable' way of setting the alternatives, so that if a user deletes the link by accident, or if there is some bug as you mentioned, then the situation gets corrected on an upgrade. I am not a Debian expert though and you may have more important things to do. Frederik -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
