On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 08:25:03AM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > >I've succesfully built gtkmm 2.10.9 and glibmm 2.12.8 packages. They > >didn't need any changes to the packaging. I didn't experience any > >problems with gtkmm programs that I've been using. Several other people > >have requested gtkmm 2.10 in the mean time, because their packages > >depend on it. I will therefore do a NMU tomorrow. > > ok, thanks.
No problem! I just uploaded glibmm 2.12.9, and will wait for the
autobuilders to compile and install it on all architectures before
uploading gtkmm 2.10.10. If there are bugs in my NMU (I hope not), I'll
fix them of course.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
