Am Montag, 14. Mai 2007 10:28 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> please use gjavah, gcjh is obsolete.

Where is this documented?  Why is there no transition plan?  Why does gcjh-4.1 
still exist?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to