Cyril Brulebois dixit: >IMHO fixing is better than workarounding. Using a bash shebang would add >an (otherwise) unnecessary Depends:
In Debian, it would not, because /bin/bash is, at the moment, required to be always there. >and having POSIX-compliant scripts sounds *much* better to me. Same for me, but I guess we can already be lucky that all scripts using /bin/sh have to not use bashisms. If there's an easy way to fix this problem without making the script use bash, ok, but I haven't heard of such functionality in other shells, so I suppose changing the shebang line here would be fine. bye, //mirabile -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
