OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 20 mai 2007, vers 16:39, "Matt Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> dbconfig-common seems to not supporte sqlite3. If only sqlite3 is >> installed, dbconfig-common complains about sqlite not being installed. >> sqlite3 executable name is sqlite3 instead of sqlite. > Adding sqlite3 support should be relatively straight forward and can > hopefully be accomplished using the existing sqlite code by creating a > variable to distinguish between calling the sqlite or sqlite3 binary. > The command interface has remained the same only the database format > changed. Do you prefer a separate backend for sqlite3 (so, no conversion needed) or do you prefer a backend that will use sqlite3 if available (or ask the user ?) and convert from sqlite to sqlite3 ? -- BOFH excuse #298: Not enough interrupts
