On Tue, 22 May 2007, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
I forgot to mention: the only encryption algorithm/schema supported by
both (pam_unix and pam_ldap) seems crypt, so it is perfectly right that
works for you.
Ah, so I got lucky :)
Better: i've not deep experimented, but seems that if you generate the
password with pam_ldap also in MD5 they are compatible with pam_unix.
The trouble came from the 'LDAP's prepended hash tags' as called by
vorlon, eg when you use 'direct ldap' tools like smbldap-tools, but
also others, i think all the web interfaces (webmin, phpldapadmin,
...).
Actually, and this'll take some experimentation, I think the important
parts are what I listed for slapd, and the 'exop' pwd interface in the
ldap tools.
Simply state that on README.Debian, pointing to the wiki as a
bonus: it was a bit confusing for me discovering all these log errors,
and pam_ldap have to be setup by hand, so proposing another
configuration would be only a bonus.
So, simply state:
What wiki? I just took over the package, and am not at all sure of
what you are referring to !
Just i'm here: i was really confused the first time i've read your
README.Debian: eg, my first setup use pam_ldap also for account and
session, not only for auth and password. :-)))
It took me a few tries to get a setup I was happy with !
--
Rick Nelson
<hoponpop> the difference between netbsd, freebsd, and openbsd, as an
insider is freebsd is interested in getting things done, and
doesn't mind hurting people who get in their way.
<hoponpop> netbsd is interested in making sure nothing gets done, and
doesn't mind hurting people who try to accomplish things.
<hoponpop> openbsd is interested in looking good, and doesn't hurt anyone
in their own little community, but look out everybody else!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
