> > As a consequence, this bug is not one..:-) > > Just because the behavior is documented doesn't mean it's not a bug. Not > being able to use 'umount' is a bug. :)
Yes. There were more details on the bug merged with that one. So, I finally also reopened the bug myself and usertagged it as "smbfs really sucks"....because this umount thing works well with cifs...:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
