On Wednesday 06 June 2007 09:32, Joost van Baal wrote: > It would be useful if the arpalert package description got extended with > a small comparison with the arpwatch package. (See also > http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html for some rationale.) > I believe adding a line like: > > If you won't use a list of authorized MAC addresses, the arpwatch > package might suit your needs better. > > would do it.
Hi Joost, I would it turn around, like "If you need to use a list of authorized MAC addresses, this package should suit your needs, otherwise arpwatch may be also fine." Anyways ... arpwatch should also have small comparison with the arpalert package included. :) With kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
pgp9gmOCCfXmW.pgp
Description: PGP signature