On Wednesday 06 June 2007 09:32, Joost van Baal wrote:
> It would be useful if the arpalert package description got extended with
> a small comparison with the arpwatch package.  (See also
> http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html for some rationale.)
> I believe adding a line like:
>
>  If you won't use a list of authorized MAC addresses, the arpwatch
>  package might suit your needs better.
>
> would do it.

Hi Joost,

I would it turn around, like "If you need to use a list of authorized MAC 
addresses, this package should suit your needs, otherwise arpwatch may be 
also fine."
Anyways ... arpwatch should also have small comparison with the arpalert 
package included. :)

With kind regards, Jan.
-- 
Never write mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: pgp9gmOCCfXmW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to