On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:12:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Sonntag, 17. Juni 2007 12:09 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: > > We currently don't consider this a bug, but a feature to actually have both > > qt versions installable. > > > > if you want to be completely sure which one you use, you can either set > > PATH and/or QTDIR appropriately. > > That isn't the point. The problem is that just calling "qmake" is useless > because either it's a Qt 3 package, which won't work if qmake is the Qt 4 > version, or vice versa. It's perfectly OK to have both qmake-qt3 and > qmake-qt4 available, but the alternative should be removed because it cannot > be useful.
You are right that 'qmake', as an alternative either pointing to version 3 or version 4, is useless when called from a script (eg. from debian/rules). But as a shortcut when used manually, it's perfectly fine IMHO. What about documenting that scripts should use qmake-qt3 or qmake-qt4, and make it a bug if a build script calls qmake? Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
