On Tuesday, 19. June 2007, Mark Purcell wrote: > Luka, > > I see from the ubuntu changelog for digikam that you claim that you no longer > need the libgphoto .la files due to the difference in the way the Kubuntu KDE > has been built.
Kubuntu _never_ needed the libgphoto2-dev .la files. This change is most of the time the only change in the digikam kubuntu pkg. > I can confirm I am still having this problem in Debian with the 0.9.2 final > release package. Damn :( Have you the time to try the fix described http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696#c28 and following comments? > > Can you provide some details so we can get this fixed in Debian? Lure and me discussed it on #kubuntu-devel on freenode. Up to now we found nothing that explains the difference. Maybe, while at debconf, you can join #debian-qt-kde on oftc. Lure and myself are usualy there too. Achim > > Thanks, > Mark > > > +digikam (2:0.9.2~beta2-1ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low > + > + * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: > + - debian/control: don't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev. > + Kubuntu's KDE finds the libgphoto plugins without the .la files. > + - debian/patches/11-add-service-menu-translations.diff: > + Rework patch to apply - French translation of .desktop file > + * Added debian/patches/digikam-svn-r669532.diff: > + Post-Beta2 fix from KDE SVN for preview bug. Closes: KDE #146072. > + > + -- Luka Renko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 30 May 2007 19:36:57 +0200 > -- To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
