On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:51:52PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Hi Joey,
> > I just reviewed all the xpdf incorporating packages wrt the 64 unclean
> > fixes. All packages beside gpdf are fixed properly, could you NMU with
> > the attached patch? (maintainer still doesn't have acked the previous)
> >
> > Instead of casting to int as proposed in the Red Hat Bugzilla I ported
> > over the MAX_INT patch, as we'll never know how upcoming GCCs will
> > still not optimize it away (in fact I strongly believe that GCC 4 with
> > SSA _will_ optimize it away).
>
> Your patch applies to the unpatched gpdf source tree, but it conflicts
> with debian/patches/000-checks.patch, which is applied as part of the
> build. 000-checks.patch seems to contain most of the same changes as
> your patch
Urgh. Brown-paper-bag me. I should read before I speak.
Regards,
Filip
--
"Microsoft shouldn't be broken up. It should be shut down."
-- Phil Agre on the ILOVEYOU virus.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
