Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well It is two week now, and I did not get a single answer. Should I > consider that as a nihil obstat ?
Sorry about this. Figuring out how to move forward with Policy was the topic of much discussion at DebConf, but also since both Manoj and I are here and pretty busy with talks, I hadn't had a chance to look at the mailing list much. I think this proposal has definitely had sufficient discussion, and the impression that I had was that it had reached consensus. Given that, I see no reason for it to not go into the next version of Policy. We're going to start using a new Policy process (Manoj is going to send out a writeup), and I'm not sure if we want to start that for the next release or do one final cleanup release with some obvious pending stuff and then start. I personally think I'd prefer the latter, including this, probably the parallel build language, and a few other things that had already been discussed and which are basically done. Manoj, what's your feeling on this? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
