Hi. It seems bug was fixed. But new [unwanted?] behaviour: on second search, previous pattern is cleared when one enters any character.
24, июня, 2007, Daniel Burrows написал: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:39:23PM +0400, Paul Romanchenko <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > Here we go! gdb stacktrace follows. > > Aptitude was built from sources fetched by 'apt-get source aptitude'. > > aptitude_0.4.5.3-1.diff.gz, aptitude_0.4.5.3-1.dsc, > > aptitude_0.4.5.3.orig.tar.gz > > > > > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > > [Switching to Thread -1212557616 (LWP 848)] > > 0xffffe410 in ?? () > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0xffffe410 in ?? () > > #1 0xbfc87e9c in ?? () > > #2 0x00000006 in ?? () > > #3 0xb7bce5b1 in abort () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 > > #4 0xb7dd2530 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () > > from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > > #5 0xb7dcfdd5 in std::set_unexpected () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > > #6 0xb7dcfe12 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > > #7 0xb7dcff3a in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > > #8 0xb7d66e5f in std::__throw_out_of_range () from > > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #9 0x0819a1ab in vs_editline::handle_key > > (this=0x8889558, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at basic_string.h:306 > > I still can't reproduce this, but I have a pretty good idea which > codepath you're going down, and I see at least one potential bug on it. > Could you try this patch and see if it helps any? > > Daniel -- :wq Paul S. Romanchenko (rmrfchik)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
