On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:39:20PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote: > Luka, > > I see from the ubuntu changelog for digikam that you claim that you no longer > need the libgphoto .la files due to the difference in the way the Kubuntu KDE > has been built. > > I can confirm I am still having this problem in Debian with the 0.9.2 final > release package. > > Can you provide some details so we can get this fixed in Debian?
I've not looked into this myself, but there's nothing I know of that Ubuntu does which should make any difference. I asked Matthias Klose who suggested Ubuntu might happen to have a reference to the gphoto.so file which Debian doesn't. I can see in /usr/lib/libdigikam.la dependency_libs='.../usr/lib/libgphoto2.la /usr/lib/libexif.la /usr/lib/libgphoto2_port.la...' but I have neither of those files installed so I'm at a bit of a loss what the difference could be. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
