On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 05:26:49PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote: > the samba-doc package contains:
> /usr/share/doc/samba-doc/htmldocs/manpages/smbsh.1.html > /usr/share/doc/samba-doc/examples/libsmbclient/smbwrapper/smbsh.c.gz > The bug is we have the manpage there but not the program. The program > has to be built by the user. > I see the following options: > 1. remove smbsh.1.html > 2. build and add smbsh to the package > 3. tag wontfix because upstream desided not to add this only as example > What do the other samba package maintainer think about this? smbsh hasn't been viable on Linux for a long time, because the method used for implementing smbwrapper stopped working due to glibc changes. I don't believe anyone has taken the time to get it working upstream since then. So 2) is not an option AFAIK. 3) doesn't make sense to me, I don't see why you would want to ship a manpage in section 1 for a non-existent "example" program. 1) looks correct to me. On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 06:00:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2007 17:26 schrieb Noèl Köthe: > > I see the following options: > > > > 1. remove smbsh.1.html > > 2. build and add smbsh to the package > > 3. tag wontfix because upstream desided not to add this only as example > > What do the other samba package maintainer think about this? > Report to upstream why they have a man page in the main documentation for an > example program. Yep. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
