On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 05:38:01PM +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Is this a matter of principle for you, or would you actually feel exploited > by a closed-source vendor who uses a libspf2 modified by your patch?
Uhm not at all. If they add other changes of their own to create an added value and don't share that with the users, I would feel bad for them, but I wouldn't feel exploited myself. I mean, I know they can do this anyway, but I don't like to help them do it better. > I mean, they can use the UNmodified libspf2 under the BSD license already. Unmodified versions are not really rellevant, unless we're talking about GPL instead of LGPL. But I think GPL is excessive for a library like libspf2 (I suppose you agree with me on that). > I'm just curious, not trying to pressure you into anything. Oh, feel free to :-). I'm always open for friendly discussion. But in that case, maybe we should keep the conversation private. I don't think we should bother everyone with it. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
