On Thursday 19 July 2007 14:37, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Well, this leads me only to guessing that we should not trust such
> statement, unless it was verified by the original reporter.

Okay .. but since 4 years, the original reporter didn't reply to this.
Couldn't this be a sign, that the problem decribed in the bug report was 
really fixed?
What I'm trying to say .. maybe both problems are not the same. :)

With kind regards, Jan.
-- 
Never write mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Reply via email to