Thank you for your very kind reply. So, maybe you would like to forward the bug 425882 to the latest version of the package?
On 24/07/07, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David wrote: > I did reply to your ping. I closed the bug because I didn't see any reply in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425451 Maybe your replied to me without keeping the bug in CC and I missed your mail, sorry if this is the case. > But it seems that this bug is n-plicated. The last stage of things is > here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425882 > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425882> > > so the bug is not solved yet. Ok fine, as long as we still have this one open, we don't care about the other being closed. > Maybe you are not paying too much attention here because 425882 is > against the obsolete xserver-xorg-video-i810 The version number of the package matters more here actually. You reported against version 2:2.0.0-1, that's the same than xserver-xorg-video-intel from our point of view, so it's far from obsolete. > 1) Forward this bug 425882 against xserver-xorg-video-intel > 2) Archive the rest of the bugs like this (as the latest information > is in 425882 and other bugs can mislead). > 3) Of course, try to fix it :-) I will help as much as I can. Don't worry, this bug in my queue of important things to take care of soon. But they are several dozens other X-related bugs in this list and I don't have time to do all this immediately, but it will happen in the "near" future :) Note that we usually don't fix this kind of bugs ourself, we talk to the actual developer (either by reporting a bug at bugzilla.freedesktop.org or by irc/mail) and try some patches. Brice
